<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defense Department Fails to Release September 11 Pentagon Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://blog.derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>So if those involved in the conspiracy were able to produce death certificates for the people they claimed were on the plane, and their family concurred that these people were in fact dead, this would be enough to satisfy you that they flew into the side of the Pentagon? The fact that were no plane parts at the Pentagon is irrelevant as long as the people they say are dead are really dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if those involved in the conspiracy were able to produce death certificates for the people they claimed were on the plane, and their family concurred that these people were in fact dead, this would be enough to satisfy you that they flew into the side of the Pentagon? The fact that were no plane parts at the Pentagon is irrelevant as long as the people they say are dead are really dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony wall</title>
		<link>http://blog.derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>tony wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>It is stated that a plane, flight 77 crashed into the pentagon.
If it was a plane, who was killed? This has to be a matter of public record.
It seems a pretty simple fact to check to dispell these conspiracy theories.
There does seem to be ongoing doubt aboout the true story of what went on at the WTC and Building 7 though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is stated that a plane, flight 77 crashed into the pentagon.<br />
If it was a plane, who was killed? This has to be a matter of public record.<br />
It seems a pretty simple fact to check to dispell these conspiracy theories.<br />
There does seem to be ongoing doubt aboout the true story of what went on at the WTC and Building 7 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://blog.derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 23:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Cheap security cameras have fixed focus. Rapidly changing light condition, like a flash? Either way it didn&#039;t appear on any of the videos from the towers, even the ones from cheap cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheap security cameras have fixed focus. Rapidly changing light condition, like a flash? Either way it didn&#8217;t appear on any of the videos from the towers, even the ones from cheap cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuickRob</title>
		<link>http://blog.derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>QuickRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 23:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekgulbranson.com/2006/05/16/defense-department-fails-to-release-september-11-pentagon-videos/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not a bright flash.

It&#039;s a problem with the camera adjusting to the initial flash of explosion when the plane (yes, a plane) hit the Pentagon.

Cheap security cameras probably dont have the best autofocus OR quality under rapidly changing light like, say, an explosion caused by a plane hitting the nation&#039;s largest concrete structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not a bright flash.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a problem with the camera adjusting to the initial flash of explosion when the plane (yes, a plane) hit the Pentagon.</p>
<p>Cheap security cameras probably dont have the best autofocus OR quality under rapidly changing light like, say, an explosion caused by a plane hitting the nation&#8217;s largest concrete structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

